The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On October 26, 2015, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s use of one of the two as if he were from the Daegu Suwon-gu detention center C, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 14:00, as if he were to use one of the two books as if he were under the ground of Germany. In addition, the Defendant was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s use of one of the two books.

It is pointed out that “The victim has two books, which uses the remainder.”

Mali도요.

Around 100, I expressed the victim’s desire to “I am on the right side of the victim” to “I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I am on the part of I

2. The above facts charged are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

Accordingly, according to the written agreement, it is recognized that the victim withdraws his/her wish to punish the defendant around May 19, 2016, which was after the public prosecution of this case was instituted. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.