A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

10 million won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

The additional collection charge shall be equivalent to the above additional collection charge.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On December 14, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Busan District Court, etc. on March 15, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on March 15, 201. On May 4, 2011, the Busan District Court sentenced a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act, which was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on September 23, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

around 2009, the defendant was aware of selling 40 illegal amusement machines to the victim AU.S.

1. On March 26, 2009, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “Around March 26, 2009, the Defendant would interfere with the crackdown on the face of 5 million won since police officers will take personnel service at the prosecution, as he/she would go through a gold entertainment room business at the bottom of the Busan Seo-gu, Busan.”

However, the defendant did not know about the control police officer or prosecutorial relations and did not have an intention or ability to keep the control.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received five million won from the victim to the new bank account in the name of AV designated by the Defendant for solicitation.

Accordingly, the Defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting the case or affairs handled by the public officials at the same time by deceiving the victim.

2. Around April 2009, the Defendant made a false statement on the victim’s “AX Entertainment room” in the “AX Entertainment room” of the victim’s operation in the Young-gu Busan Metropolitan City, Young-gu, on April 2009, stating that “The Defendant would return all the money received as the personnel expenses of the mechanical value ditch, if the crackdown is conducted separately from the police officer in the jurisdiction.”

However, the defendant did not know about the police officer in the jurisdiction and did not receive money from the victim, and the defendant expressed his intention to crack down it.