Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant filed a civil petition with the Si/Gun Office and the Si/Gun Police Station from the end of December 201, when the noise and dust scattering occurred due to the blasting work of the base bars after obtaining permission to construct a low temperature warehouse from around October 1, 201, which was operated by the victim D (51 years of age) on the land outside and outside of the Si/Gun, and the Defendant filed a civil petition with the Si/Gun Office and the Si/Gun Police Station from the end of December 201, and continued to claim the site.

On the other hand, the defendant has been engaged in the construction business and was represented by the victim D with regard to filing and coordinating civil petitions for construction work on the ground that it is the leading factor in the civil petition filing.

However, with respect to the above site creation project, the noise level measurement result by the Korea Military Service was measured below the noise level level on June 201, and it was confirmed that there was no damage to the building due to blasting impact assessment by a professional engineer around May 201.

1. Suppression;

A. On January 16, 2012, the Defendant: “A victim D (the age of 51) who found the Defendant at the Defendant’s house located in Gyeong-gun, Scking-gun, Scking-gun, experienced difficulties in construction due to frequent civil petitions by the Defendant at the Defendant’s house located in G, and transferred KRW 15 million to the Defendant’s account by personally paying KRW 15 million to F residents, but, on January 31, 2012, the Defendant paid KRW 15 million to himself/herself and the village head H, to settle the civil petition of the resident, and having the residents of the city reach an agreement with KRW 35 million; and “I will continue to file a civil petition without complying with such agreement” to the effect that “I will interfere with construction by continuously filing a civil petition.” On or around January 16, 2011, the Defendant was frighted from the victim, who received KRW 10 million from the Defendant’s account under the Defendant’s leakage or I’s transfer to H account.

B. The purport of the Defendant’s phone called from the Defendant’s home located in Gyeongnam-gun G around March 2012 to the effect that “I will continue to interfere with construction by filing a civil petition without additional knowledge of KRW 5 million.”