logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2020.06.12 2020고합111
살인미수등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

An order shall be issued to a person requesting probation who has been placed on probation for two years.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The facts of the cause of the request for probation order [criminal facts] The defendant and the person requesting probation order (hereinafter referred to as the "defendants") were born from the Chinese Joseon Republic of China's Joseon Republic of China, and around 2001, at the People's Republic of China's Republic of China's Office (hereinafter referred to as "the defendants") obtained the nationality of the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea while married the victim with the victim on or around 2002, or around 2002, there was an economic difficulties in living married in the Republic of Korea, such as acquisition of the nationality of the Republic of Korea, birth of his/her father, etc., and the adaptation of the life of the Republic of Korea, disputes with the victim, etc., which resulted from the diagnosis of friendly and yellow disorder around 2006, have been working as an assistant nurse, etc., and have tried to maintain the family by continuing economic activities until now, but around November 2019, the defendant and his/her currency have not been completed, and it has been refused to divorce by the victim's.

At around 21:50 on March 12, 2020, the Defendant, when drinking alcohol with the victim, and drinking alcohol again with the external problem of the victim, heard the victim’s desire to read “I think that the Defendant was able to think that the Defendant was fluorily, and fluorly fluor, fluord only with wind.” Accordingly, the Defendant recovered a telephone recording file that makes it possible for the Defendant to confirm the external problem of the victim, thereby leaving the Defendant’s cell phone by cutting off the Defendant’s cell phone, and fluoring the Defendant, but on the premise that the Defendant’s father was fluor, the Defendant was fluoring from the victim before seeing that the Defendant’s wife was fluor.

Although the Defendant has been making efforts to be faithful to the family life despite diseases, such as depression, it was assaulted before the Defendant’s care without being subject to genuine apology from the victim even though the family became bankrupt due to the appearance of the victim.

arrow