logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.11.14 2019나2011485
소유권이전등기
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are the part resulting from the supplementary participation.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 27, 2006, the Defendant, including the parties, purchased the instant land through a public auction procedure followed by the registration of seizure, etc. on May 17, 1993, which was completed on the land in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, which was owned by N (hereinafter “instant land”). On October 4, 2006, the registration of transfer of ownership in the Defendant’s name was completed due to the public auction on the said land.

The Plaintiffs are divided owners of the “OBL” Pdong (hereinafter “instant condominium”) which is an aggregate building (multi-household) constructed on the instant land.

[A. Article 4 and 5 (if a, including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)

[b] b.

Q, the father of N on July 16, 190, was divided into R and S (Tro Registration Conversion on March 31, 1992), and U or V, including the instant land, on the same day.

(2) On May 8, 191, Q was inherited to the wife and children of Q (No. 11, No. 12, No. 4). On April 25, 1992, the land of this case was owned by Na, W A, andY respectively, through the co-inheritors’ co-inheritors’ co-inheritors’ co-inheritors’ co-inheritors’ co-ownership of co-ownership of co-ownership of property.

After that, the land in this case and the land in U,W, AA, and Y (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant loan site”) were respectively constructed by OBC, ABdong, ACdong, ADdong, ADdong, and AEdong (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant loan”).

(A) Evidence Nos. 15, B No. 1, 19). (c)

1) The construction process, etc. of the instant condominium building was conducted through the “AF” company, which was contracted by Q as above, and the construction was suspended due to the said company’s default, but the said construction was resumed after August 192 (No. 23-2) and R was conducted again (No. 23-2) around September 18, 192).

arrow