logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.07.24 2014고단1933
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 23, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on November 23, 2007, and on January 9, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of three million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the same court on January 9, 2013 and violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice.

On May 21, 2014, at around 23:45, the Defendant driven CAburged car with approximately KRW 200-30 meters alcohol level without obtaining a driver's license in the section from the front day of the head office in which it is impossible to identify the trade name in Black-dong in Gwangju Mine-gu to the front day of the 145-gil-ro 145-gil-ro of the same Gu, and while under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.154% without obtaining a driver's license.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each entry into the report on the status of driving on a driving on a driving on a motor vehicle, the report on the circumstantial statement of a driver on a driving on a motor vehicle;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes stated in criminal records, references to criminal records, investigation reports (former records and attachment reports of judgment);

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting a crime (the point of a sound driving) and subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 152 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do139, Apr. 1,

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. An order to attend a lecture shall be rendered for the reasons under Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;

arrow