The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (one hundred months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include: (a) the fact that the Defendant recognized the mistake of the Defendant; (b) the fact that the Defendant agreed smoothly with the victim; and (c) the fact that the Defendant has certain occupation.

However, the fact that the crime of this case was committed without being aware of the fact that the method of the crime was planned and closely poor, such as purchasing a large phone for the purpose of theft, approaching the victim, forging the registration number plate, and operating it on the vehicle, etc., and committing the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that the crime of this case was committed is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of all the circumstances indicated in the records and pleadings, such as the above-mentioned normal relationship, the age, character and conduct, the environment, the background leading to the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it is not determined that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, it shall be corrected that the “vehicle Registration Board” in Section 8 of the judgment of the court below is added after the “vehicle Registration Board”.