b. Violation of the Building Act, 2006 Height293

(c) Violation of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act;

Newly Inserted by Presidential Decree No. 2011, Dec. 1, 201

dwelling and permanent domicile, king-si **

Gyeongnam-do

Law Firm Barununa

Attorney Cho Jong-sung and Han-sung in charge

May 30, 2007

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000. Where the Defendant fails to pay the above fine, the Defendant shall be confined in the workhouse for a period calculated by converting 50,000 won into one day.

Criminal facts

The Defendant is a State Mayor;

1. In order to construct a new building, etc. in the above area in the MaBC Down, which is to be broadcasted from May 2006, in order to build a new building in the area of MabC Down-si No. 2, a Sin-si, a Sin-si, a Sin-si, a Sin-si, a Sin-si, a Sin-si, the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transport determines to newly build a "Gun-si," a Sin-si, a Sin-si (hereinafter referred to as the "Gun-si, a Sin-si") under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act:

A. On Oct. 10, 2005, Nasan-si and 141,200 square meters of No. 141,200 square meters of No. 147, Nasan-si, Masan-si and 141,200 square meters of No. 27, Magmon-si, Magmon-si, the manufacturing company of No. 1455, Magmon-si, the company of No. 1455, and the company of No. 1,654 (a total area of No. 5,654 square meters) shall be constructed without obtaining permission from the competent authority; (b) without obtaining permission from the competent authority for conversion of a mountainous district, the company of No. 2,034 square meters of No. 52,034 square meters of No. 12, the company of No. 2005, the company

(c) not obtain any permission from the competent authorities on the diversion of farmland;

(1) During the above temporary border development zone, Hansi-si, a farmland, Nasi-si, Nasi-si, 232-2 and 728-1 parcel of land to be diverted to farmland. (2) around April 7, 2006, Hansi-si, Nasi-si, the farmland of which is farmland in the Agricultural Promotion Zone, the Hansi-si, 190 square meters, set up a parking lot for the victims of the farmland to enter the above set and convert the farmland to the farmland. On November 16, 2006, 1100 Nasi-dong, the Sinsi-si, the Sin-si, an Internet news gathering company, had the victim do so without reporting the victim's face to the victim, and then, 100 Nasi-si, the victim's face and the victim's Dok-si, the Internet news gathering company, who was located in the Sinju-dong market located in the Agricultural Promotion Zone, did not report the victim's face to the victim's face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Each police record of KimO, Professor00, No. 00, HanO, No. 00, Park 00, Park 00, and Kim 00

Application of Statutes

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

Article 79 subparag. 1 and Article 8(1) of the Building Act, Article 53 subparag. 1 and Article 14(1) of the Management of Mountainous Districts Act, Article 59(1) and Article 36(1) of the Farmland Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (Selection of each fine)

Articles 37 (former part), 38 (1) 2, and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

The reason for sentencing is criticism that the Defendant, as a Naju market, was a person with the authority to permit various kinds of permits and permits related to the lives of local residents, and complied with laws and regulations and settled legal administration, despite the fact that the Defendant, while not undergoing a normal administrative procedure, was required to newly build a Namon in violation of relevant laws and regulations. However, if the Defendant would go through a normal administrative procedure at the time, he would inevitably proceed with administrative procedures and new construction for the development of the region in the situation where it is difficult to spread the Naju City, and would inevitably continue to make complementary efforts to remove the illegal state. Since the substantial portion of the site of the Namon farm site was in the state of being destroyed due to the existing installation of livestock wastewater treatment facilities, there were no adverse effects such as environmental destruction due to the Domine market, etc., on the other hand, it appears that the Defendant had been given preferential treatment to the specific person for the reason that the Defendant had already been given due to the public official’s efforts to promote the creation of income and gain income from the Dominary market.

Mahee-hee