logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.04.19 2016고단5984
변호사법위반
Text

[Defendant A] The sentence against the defendant shall be imposed one year of imprisonment.

89,113,400 won shall be collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, around November 1, 1999, retired from office to office Grade 7 in general service at the Gangnam-gu Gun Office (Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office) prior to the retirement of the Defendant. From December 5, 2009, the Defendant registered a business operator in the name of “E” and worked as a broker for contract awarded by the former government offices, such as Jinjin-gun, etc., and then worked as a broker for contract awarded by the former government offices.

On November 2009, the Defendant is well aware of the public officials of the Gangwon-do and its neighboring Gun Office, who are the representative director of the company in G Office of G Co., Ltd., the Defendant: “I are working for a long time in the environmental position in the Gangnam-gun, the Southern-gun, and are well aware of it.”

In order to conclude a contract with respect to the delivery cases, such as I ordered by the local government offices, the public official in charge of the contract in charge, who has succeeded to the contract contract contract amounting to 20% price of the down payment, shall be changed in return for the down payment.” The consent of H was obtained.

On May 4, 2011, the Defendant: (a) contacted H around May 4, 201 to request funds necessary for the activities of receiving government contracts; (b) around that time, the Defendant received KRW 15 million from H as activity expenses to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant’s wife, for contact with the public officials in charge regarding the contract amount of the order of the Nam-gun, which is KRW 129,737,000,000 from H, in total, from around 12 times to May 12, 2014; and (c) received KRW 164,526,000,000, in total, from around 12 times, under the pretext that the supply contract of the order of the public office in the south-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City was awarded to the public officials in charge of contact with the public officials in charge.

Accordingly, the Defendant received a total of KRW 164,526,00 on the pretext of soliciting or arranging the affairs of public officials.

2. The Defendant of the 2017 Highest 1278, 2011, who was working for the Defendant with the brodser of the government-funded construction works for the remaining area of G, a corporation, in the trade name in the north-west Eup located around spring 2011;

A is well aware of the public officials of the Gwangjin-gun's Office in the Republic of Korea as the U.S. military official in the Republic of Korea.

The sewage construction project ordered by the Young-gun is a corporation G public law.

arrow