1. Compulsory execution against the Defendant’s Plaintiff based on the Daegu District Court Decision 201Gadan82695 Decided May 24, 2012.

In full view of the purport of the argument in Gap evidence No. 1, with respect to the Defendant’s obligation to return lease deposit in accordance with the judgment of the Daegu District Court 201Kadan82695 ( May 10, 2012, the closing date of pleadings) against the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff is recognized as having received the Daegu District Court 2015Kadan1849, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 1, 2015.

According to the above Daegu District Court Decision 201Kadan82695, compulsory execution based on the above Daegu District Court Decision should not be permitted. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified.