logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고정1539
재물손괴
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who leases a warehouse owned by the victim B (68).

1. From August 23, 2017 to August 26, 2017, at around 17:00 between the Defendant, the Defendant: (a) made 490,000 won by inserting red presses on the doors and walls owned by the victim in Daejeon Dong-gu Daejeon, namely, “in the process of a lucing lawsuit,” and thereby making it difficult for the Defendant to gather and use foreign materials that cannot be known on the entrance locks of the market price of KRW 70,000.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

2. The Defendant from around 10:00 on August 31, 2017 to the same year.

9.6. At around 17:00 between Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon, the victim left the entrance door into the warehouse, and the hacks equivalent to the market value of 5,000 won and the hacks equivalent to 2,000 won in the market value.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to B;

1. Reporting on the arrest of the offender or the case;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation results and investigation results;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. In a case where the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) is recognized, the circumstances favorable to the defendant and the degree of damage may be mitigated;

In full view of the fact that the defendant was unable to receive a letter from the injured party or that there are many criminal records, a fine for the summary order is imposed.

shall not be deemed to exist.

arrow