The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

The summary of the facts charged is the defendant who is engaged in driving Calba.

On October 8, 2012, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 09:07, while driving the above vehicle at around 09:07, and driving on the front road of 621-7, luminous-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-

A driver has a duty of care to check and drive the course safety by checking well the front left and left well.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence of driving a vehicle in neglect, the victim D (35 years of age, South) who was parked in the same three-lanes of the same room is driving, and the latter part of the driver's seat of the E-Wurn-Wurn-Wurn-Wurn-Wurn driver's vehicle was inferred into the front wheels of the Defendant O

After all, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (the 65 years of age, women) who was on the back of the Oral Ocean due to the above occupational negligence, in need of a three-time treatment due to the pathal satum, etc.

However, this is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it can be recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6)