logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.09.13 2017나2016240
소유권보존등기말소 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

The plaintiff in the scope of the judgment of this court against the defendant: ① the procedure for the cancellation of the registration of this case; ② the request for the cancellation of the registration of this case; ② the court of first instance dismissed the above claim against the defendant; and ② the above part of the claim was dismissed.

As to this, the Plaintiff appealed only to the claim ① above.

Therefore, the scope of the judgment of this court is ① the part of the claim for the execution of the procedure for the cancellation registration of this case against the defendant.

The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff who cited the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows each evidence submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasoning for this case is as follows, except for those cases in which the court has dismissed, it is identical to the entries in Chapters 2, 13, 12, and 4, 10, 7, and 15, respectively. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 4 of the judgment of the first instance court, "B. Determination on the claim for cancellation of registration of preservation of ownership of this case" is understood as "2. Determination on the claim for cancellation of registration of preservation of ownership of this case".

Part 4, 11, 19, 2, and 6, 7, 3, of the decision of the first instance.

“,” and “b.

“......”

"At each level, each of them is friendship."

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim for cancellation of the registration of preservation of ownership against the defendant is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow