The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) of the lower court is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.
2. The act of arranging sexual traffic is a state of social harm, such as the commercialization of a woman's sex and undermining the sound sexual culture and good morals, and it is necessary to protect the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to severely punish them even in order to establish a sound sexual culture, and the fact that the defendant has a history of criminal punishment twice for the same crime is disadvantageous to the defendant.
However, in full view of the following facts: (a) the Defendant led to the instant crime; (b) the Defendant has no record of being punished in excess of the fine due to the same kind of crime; and (c) other various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, such as the background and amount of profit of the instant crime; (b) the character and home environment of the Defendant; and (c) the circumstances before and after the instant crime, it
3. If so, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.