logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 동부지원 2020.07.24 2020고정72
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for breach of trust and one year of suspended execution at the Busan District Court, which became final and conclusive on April 19, 2017.

The Defendant borrowed approximately KRW 200 million from C while operating a screen golf course in Busan Southern-gu Btel, but failed to repay due to business deterioration. On May 7, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed a request for auction on the corporeal movables in the screen golf course in Busan District Court Support, based on the above claim; (b) entrusted all of the authority on the auction process to the Defendant, who is the debtor, was delegated to the Defendant; (c) filed a request for auction with the Defendant, who is an employee of the Defendant, on the ground that the debtor cannot be the trustee of the movable auction; and (d) filed a request for appraisal on some corporeal movables, such as coffee, from the enforcement officer, to file a request for appraisal during the auction process of the said corporeal movables; (c) however, at the time, the Defendant, the trustee of the instant case, was unable to file an application under the name of E, because he retired from his company.

On May 26, 2015, the Defendant prepared an application for the appraisal of the seizure of the said application using a black pen located in the Busan District Court's Dong branch branch's office located in Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Dong branch's branch's office. At the time, the Defendant, without the consent of F, arbitrarily entered the applicant's name in the applicant column and signed it. At the time, the Defendant forged one copy of the application for the appraisal of the seizure of F's name, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations, by means of signing the applicant column without the consent of F, and submitted to the person in charge of the office in charge of the execution officer who did not know of the forgery at

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. The prosecutor's statement concerning the F;

1. G.

arrow