A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, using the fact that it is illegal to provide customers with drinking and gambling in a singing room, had been provided with drinking and gambling, and had the right to receive the return of the price by advertising as if he reported the completion of the work.

On January 20, 2012, at around 23:00, the Defendant 23:00, sent to the “Esing room” operated by the victim D (hereinafter referred to as 58 years of age) in Gwangju Northern-gu, the Defendant 1 and 60,000 won per 1 Docle and 1 Docle come to the room after being in cash, and entered the room for a basic time 1 hour, and used it for the victim to see the appearance of the victim. “I am back money because I am without a fri, I am back the money.” If the victim does not respond to it, the Defendant saw that the Defendant reported the illegal facts to the police.

The Defendant, from that time, received 60,000 won from the victim of frighten drinking, from around October 18, 2014, from that time, the Defendant received 60,000 won from the victim of frighten drinking, and received a total amount of 935,00 won and fright value from the victim of frighten drinking at around 03:50 on October 18, 201, as stated in the attached list of crimes.

Accordingly, the defendant did not receive or attempted to receive property by threatening the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A copy of each police interrogation protocol against F and G;

1. Each police statement made to D, H, I, J, K, L, M, N, andO;

1. Details of the transaction of the Nonghyup Card;

1. Each investigation report (verification of the approval details of the NongHyk Card of a Suspect - Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the possibility of additional violence, criminal tendency of a suspect, and risk of recidivism);

1. Relevant Articles 350(1) (a) and 352 of the Criminal Act (a point of conflict), 350(1) (a) (a point of attempted conflict) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders are as follows: (a) although the defendant led to the crime of this case, he/she is deemed to have led to the confession and the wife; and (b) the amount of