The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (7 million won of a fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Ex officio determination

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaged in driving B rocketing and another car.

Around 13:05 on February 4, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car and got to turn to the left at about 60 km each hour from the 10th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth end eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e

Since there is an intersection where the sign board before the non-protection line is installed, the driver has the duty to take a duty to safely turn to the left after checking whether there is a vehicle coming from the front by reducing the speed and checking well the front side.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so and has to turn to the left at the two-lanes consecutively without reducing speed;

The front part of the C Operation, which was driven by the route signal from the west-dong to the west-dong, was received in front of the Defendant’s passenger car.

In the end, the Defendant suffered serious injury, such as the flaco infection by the sapap extract from which the number of treatment days cannot be known to the victim E (the age of 69) who was aboard the damaged vehicle due to the above occupational negligence, damage to the galcosium in which the victim E (the age of 69) was unable to know, and damage to the galcos open in the mouth, non-alley, internal wall cuttings, the structural fladne, spathal flas, and

B. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning

According to the records, the Defendant submitted a written agreement under the name of the victim on March 26, 2013, and the said written agreement is a student with the victim’s promise not to raise any objection later by the smooth agreement on traffic accident (the injury and physical damage). “The victim is a student before entering the society.”