The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) although the Defendant had a dispute between the victim and the victim at the time and place indicated in the judgment of the court below, the Defendant did not inflict an injury on the victim by taking the victim’s birth as stated in the judgment of

Nevertheless, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case. The court below erred by misunderstanding facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, namely, ① the victim’s statement from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, the witness’s statement in the court of the court below to the court of the court below, and the witness’s statement in the court of the court below, are relatively specific and consistent with each other’s statement as well as credibility in line with each other’s statement. ② The victim complained of pains immediately after the instant crime was committed, and conducted diagnosis and treatment on September 18, 2014 (at the time, approximately two weeks’ treatment was conducted) by finding the hospital (I) on the day of the crime, and the victim was diagnosed and treated (at the time, undergo the diagnosis of injury, such as the left-hand legumumumumumum, etc.), and the victim was sufficiently informed of the victim’s daily life through additional examination (CT, etc.) on October 1, 2014, which affected the victim’s daily life before being diagnosed by the victim.