(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.03.31 2015고정318

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.03.31 2015고정318

사기

Text

1. The sentence against the accused shall be 3,000,000 won;

2. The defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 23, 2013, the fraud Defendant calls the victim C at the Defendant’s residence of Jin-si B, 101 Dong 502, around December 23, 2013, and calls to the victim C for an investigation at the prosecutor’s office. The same applies to cases where the cost of attorney-at-law is high.

The success fee is also necessary.

B. A loan of KRW 10 million to B shall be sold to B, as soon as possible, 6 billion fake land.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have to pay the contingent fee to the attorney at the time, and did not have the 6 billion won fake land. The defendant did not have any intention or ability to change it to the victim, because there was no fixed income and there was no obligation to pay the 1.3 billion won to the defendant for the damages due to the economic situation, such as there was no obligation to pay the 1.3 billion won to the defendant, and it was thought that the defendant would not have any intention or ability to change it.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received KRW 10 million from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number D) in the name of the Defendant around 17:06 on the same day from the victim.

2. On June 6, 2014, at the Defendant’s residence of Jin-si B, 101 Dong 502, May 31, 2014, the Defendant was allowed to lend money to the said C by calling to the said C.

After allowing the victim E and above C to make a telephone call in the next place, the said C transferred KRW 10 million to a new bank account (G Account Number) in the name of F, which is the seat of the victim.

After June 6, 2014, the Defendant called the victim at the residence of the above Defendant and contacted the victim as to why he would not pay the money from C.

On the other hand, even the money now at issue, the Korean government made a false statement "I will pay I a full payment to C."

However, even if the defendant receives money from the injured party, he thought that it will be used as personal debt repayment and living expenses.

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2020.05.29 2019고단158

-청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.05.16 2016고단880

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.08.19 2016고단1014

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.22 2015고단1477

-부산지방법원 2020.01.15 2019고단4923