1. The Defendants trade on September 14, 1982 with respect to each of 1/4 shares of F. F. 116 square meters in Daegu-gun, the Plaintiff.

1. In full view of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and all the arguments against defendant B, the plaintiff purchased 2,200,000 square meters of the purchase price from Gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

According to the above facts, Defendant B is obligated to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer on September 14, 1982 with respect to the portion of 1/4 of the instant real estate to the Plaintiff.

2. As to Defendant C, D, and E

(a) The indication of the claim is identical to the above recognition.

(b) Defendant D or E: Judgment without holding any pleadings (Article 208(3)1, and Article 257 of the Civil Procedure Act);

(c) Defendant C: Judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)

3. The conclusion is that the plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.