logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.09.01 2016고단474
폭행등
Text

1. The sentence against the accused shall be determined as a fine of 4,00,000 (private million won);

When the defendant does not pay a fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 22, 2016, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) notified the 1112 report of the assault, and the police officer G of the Jung-gu Police Station that called out after receiving the 112 report of the assault, thereby obstructing the Defendant’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer in the act of violence by assaulting the police officer on the ground of the defect in arresting the Defendant in the act of assault and attempting to take aboard the patrol vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes entered in the police statement of G and D

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On January 22, 2016, the charges of assault against the Defendant on the part dismissing the prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are as follows: (a) around 22:40 on January 22, 2016, the Defendant assaulted on the part of the Defendant on the part of the dismissal of prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order by drinking alcohol at the main point of “E for the operation of the victim D's D' in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and after drinking alcohol from the victim,

The crime of violence falls under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and shall not be prosecuted against the express will of the victim under paragraph (3) of the same Article.

Since the victim expressed his intention not to be punished against the defendant after filing the prosecution of this case, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow