logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2021.02.18 2020고단4151
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 25, 2020, the Defendant damaged property on the road in front of Busan, Busan, on July 22, 2020, for the purpose of “D” of the opening commemorative “D,” on the ground that the above C was leased from the victim E, who is a tide, and was displayed in front of the above building, and was f (F, 530cm in length, 220cm in height, 180cm in width) equivalent to KRW 100,000,000 in the market price of the above F of rubber material, on the ground that the above C was sick.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property owned by the victim.

2. At around July 25, 2020, the Defendant: (a) 22:45, the Defendant: “In the front of the foregoing, the Defendant: (b) destroyed F and damaged her reputation; (c) and (d) took a bath to “I and several people of the Management Team employees of the Busan Police Station G District, who were asked questions about their personal information from H, who was called out after receiving a 112 report; and (d) expressed that “I and the surrounding police officers of the Management Team, who were sent to the Busan Police Station G District; and (e) expressed that “I will have the same son, she was asked to do so.”

Accordingly, the defendant openly insultingd the victim.

3. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the end of the day set forth in paragraph (2) 2, as in paragraph (2) 2, committed an assault, such as taking a bath to a policeman and taking an article into consideration, and being arrested as a current offender of the damage of property and insult by the slope J, such as the above H, and assaulting the milch of the above H one time by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who is a police officer, interfered with the handling of the reported case and the lawful execution of duties concerning the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the following Acts and subordinate statutes: A written statement of the I to the investigation report (a written estimate, etc. attached), the investigation report (to be attached toCCTV image data), the investigation report (to be reported on the police telephone statement), B written statements, six copies of the B written statements (15 pages of the investigation records), four copies of the photo (66 pages of the investigation records);

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the Criminal Act.

arrow