1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: ① additional evidence submitted in the court of first instance, which is insufficient to reverse the facts acknowledged by the court of first instance; ② The judgment as to the allegations made by the Defendants in the court of first instance is added as follows; ③ the court of first instance dismissed "H" as "F"; ③ the court of first instance dismissed "H" as "H" as "F"; and the court of first instance as of January 8, 2010" as of January 18, 2010 as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance stated "F" as "I.18, 2010."

2. As to the assertion made at the trial

A. Since January 18, 2010, the alleged networkF paid 27,691,000 won to the Plaintiff additionally.

B. 1) The net F paid KRW 27,691,00 to the Plaintiff from April 12, 2010 to January 14, 2014. 2) The Plaintiff paid KRW 28,240,200 to the netF from January 22, 2010 to January 24, 2014.

[Grounds for recognition] Entry of No. 8 of Eul and the purport of the whole pleading

C. It is insufficient to recognize that the determination network F was paid in addition, and there is no other evidence to prove otherwise, the above assertion is without merit.

3. If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and all appeals by the defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.