logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.04.12 2018고단369
변호사법위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and for six months, respectively.

Defendant

A 50,350,000 won, Defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

(B) Defendant B was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of conflict, etc. at the Gwangju District Court on March 14, 2014 and completed the execution of the above sentence on December 26, 2014.

[2] Defendant B is a person who operates an newspaper company with the trade name “I” in the Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area H, and Defendant A is a person registered as the said I’s reporter from around 2011 to around 2016.

Defendant

A listening to the purport that, around June 2015, at the office of the Korea Environment Corporation, the Republic of Korea National Police Agency, located in the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, and the Republic of Korea, the Republic of

It is well known that the National Police Agency had access to the Republic of Korea, and through this reporter, it is not bound by the National Police Agency by solicitation to police officers, and the case will also be closed.

“......” continuously calls Defendant B, and “J....”

I think this case is different from this case."

Defendant

B around the above time, K at the time of its response

On December 2016, L(2016. 12.) calls to L, to find out the fact that the investigation officer in charge of the investigation of the above case is the M of the National Police Agency, and calls to N (the former president) who is the seat of the above M, who is under investigation by the intelligence investigation unit of the National Police Agency of South Korean National Police Agency.

I would like to talk about the part of suppression by finding M.

After 100, N.N. said, N.N. Does to find me after 200.”

On July 2015, 2015, the first half to third day, the Defendants met J at a mutual infinite restaurant located in the Seoul High-Tech District, and considered the specific case of J from J, and then considered the case to J.

Defendant B means “A”, and Defendant B calls to Defendant A at an insular place on July 4, 2015, and “the former Local Police Agency.”

arrow