Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 19, 2015, the Defendant was driving at CAW on 13:45 on June 19, 2015, and the Defendant was driving on the road in front of the 1278 present elementary school in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Seoul at the time of Suwon, with the front of the child protection zone of each elementary school in front of the 1278 present elementary school.

At all times, the signal apparatus was installed at a crosswalk that works normally, so the driver has a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalk in accordance with the traffic signals and prevent the traffic accident.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to stop on the front side, and even if the signal apparatus was changed to a red signal, and was negligent in the course of business due to a violation of signal as is, and led to a conflict between the bridge and the arms part of the victim D (7 tax, female) who walked along the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals from the right side of the direction of the course to the left side of the road.

Therefore, the victim suffered bodily injury, such as the string on the right side of the bridge, which requires two weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (as at the fourth public trial date);

1. Statement made by the police with regard to E;

1. A traffic accident-related statement prepared by the F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the statutes governing field photographs and CCTV video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1), the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1, 6, and 11 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Taking into account the fact that the defendant's reasons for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects his criminal act, the defendant has no criminal record for the same kind of crime, and the damage was recovered through a comprehensive insurance.