A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 80 hours.

Punishment of the crime

From January 6, 2013 to January 16, 2016 of the same month, the Defendant threatened C by transmitting text messages that threaten C, such as “I ambling, 65 years of age,” “I ambling off at Cp, I ambris, I ambris,” “I ambris, I ambris, I ambris, I ambris,” “I ambris, I ambris, I ambris,” “I ambris, I ambris, I ambris, I ambris, I ambris,” “I ambris, I ambris, I ambris, I ambris,” and “I ambris, I ambris, I ambre, I ambre, I ambris,” and

At around 11:00 on January 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed indecent act by compulsion, and the Defendant: (b) committed an indecent act by compulsion on the part of the victim C in front of the submission station located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (c) on the part of the Defendant, the Defendant was forced to cab by cutting down the lower part of C, stating that “A would have come well to the flabbp.”

After that, the Defendant removed the mobile phone distribution box of C in order to prevent the Defendant from entering the Gel 206 Gel 206 located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, and from reporting to the investigation agency, and then, “Ye-si Mak Mak Makb. Ba-Mak Mak Mab, which is known to the other male only. The Defendant reported Ne Na, thereby being bound by the inside and remaining arrest, and the life of the patient was lost in the bread.” The Defendant sent the face and head part of C’s face and head at least three to four times by drinking or hand, threateninged that “Ie-si Man Man and other male only.”

A victim C made a statement that the police was about five times the face of drinking and the head, but the prosecution stated that the same part as drinking was about three to four times, and this court stated that it was about three to four times the same part in this court, but it was about three to four times the same part in this court. The statement in this court is determined that the highest credibility of the statement in this court is recognized, and it is included within the scope of this part of the facts charged, and it is recognized as identical to the above facts charged.

2.3