logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2017.10.18 2017노1751
폭행등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In a way to misunderstanding the fact, although the victim's shoulder and chest was pushed down, the victim's head was boomed or did not cut down (a crime of violence). The defendant only has spawn water on the vehicle owned by the victim in order to refuse to comply with the demand for eviction, and carried out water on the net of the vehicle on the part of the vehicle on the part of the victim, with a chemical blick with soil contained therein, and there is no brut that the vehicle was flicked with a chemical blick (the point of damage to property) and caused a gold on the front glass of the vehicle.

2. Determination

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court as to the assertion of mistake of facts, the fact that the Defendant committed assault by means of cutting down the victim’s shoulder and breast part, booming the head and booming the head as stated in the facts constituting the crime of the lower judgment, and that the Defendant was faced with a chemical boom, thereby making the front glass of the vehicle run a gold.

Defendant

We cannot accept the assertion.

1) At the court below, the victim was present as a witness, and there was a fact that he was threatening in knife by knife, knife knife knife knife knife and knife knife knife knife.

“The escape from confinement was located in a vehicle that was located in a remote range,” but there was a gas generated in front of the weather and the vehicle due to the destruction of various kinds of diversity, etc. and the destruction of stones in the surrounding areas.

“The statement was made”.

The contents of the above statements are consistent, specific, and supported by other objective evidence, such as written estimates, field photographs, etc. by investigation agencies.

2) On August 23, 2016, H of the lower court’s witness confirmed that the gold would be closed in its original form on the front glass of the vehicle, and written a written estimate.

In light of the shape of gold, the gold stated that it was spared as if it was spared with the material of rubber instead of having the stone straw, and that it was spared with the material of rubber.

arrow