logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.07.21 2017고단2101
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 22:30 on May 16, 2017, the Defendant received 112 domestic violence in front of the building B in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (in the indictment, as stated in the indictment, but according to the details of the current arrest warrant and the written application submitted by the Defendant’s wife, the Defendant appears to have reported the above site to a third party. As such, the above part of the written indictment is corrected as above) sent to the scene, on the ground that: (a) the police box of the Seoul Nowon-gu Police Station C in Seoul, Nowon-gu, and one other, dispatched to the site to the site and prevented the Defendant from smuggling, the Defendant assaulted at one time at the left side of the above D.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the order of provisional payment is that the case is not easy in light of the background of the crime of this case and the degree of assault. Meanwhile, the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case. The defendant, at the time, who was dispatched to the police officer who was reported during his school to the defendant's father and the defense against the denial or denial, appears to have led to the crime of this case by interesting the police officer who was dispatched after being reported during his school to the defendant's father and the defense against him at the time, and the defendant is punished for the same crime of this case or has no record of crime exceeding the fine, and other circumstances revealed in the records of this case and the theory of change shall be

arrow