1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for this part of the facts of recognition is as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for the case where part of the reasoning for this part is written as follows. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be subject to the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance by cutting the second part of the 11st "sever group" into "st

The third party of the judgment of the first instance to the fourth party shall be in parallel with the following:

“2) 임술보(1922년)에는 AQ의 아들인 K(K, 1850년생)의 자손에 대한 기재가 되어있지 아니하고, 갑자보(1924년)에는 AQ의 아들인 K이 남무(男无, 절손되었다는 의미이다)라고 기재되어 있다. 정유보(1957년)에는 L이 K의 자(子)로 기재되어 있고, 정묘보(1987년)에도 L과 그 후손들이 기재되어 있다. 을해보(1995년)에는 갑자보와 같이 AQ의 아들인 K이 남무(男无)라고 기재되어 있다.” 제1심판결 제3쪽 제13행부터 제16행까지를 아래와 같이 고쳐 쓴다. “3) 제적등본상 L의 처는 ‘W씨’로 생년월일은 ‘AR생’이고, T의 생년월일은 ‘X’이며, T의 처는 ‘Y’로 ‘Z씨’이다. 정유보, 정묘보상 L의 처는 ‘W씨’로, 생년월일은 ‘AS생’이고, V의 생년월일은 ‘AA생’이며 V의 처는 ‘Z씨’이다.” 제1심판결 제4쪽 제1행의 ‘사묘년’을 ‘기묘년’으로 고쳐 쓴다.

2. Among the satisfaction reports in which the Plaintiff’s subsequent losses were written, it is stated that K died without her children. K is in a position to link the house with A Q head, and when compilation is made, K is not required to omit it if there is a child of K at the time of the death of K.

On the other hand, there are no credibility of the reservation of the decedent and the portrait because there are many false supporters at the time of publication of the reservation of the decedent and the portrait.

Therefore, K's children listed in the reservation and the funeral are not the Plaintiff's paper.