logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.01.12 2017고정784
절도
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On March 30, 2016, the Defendant entered into a contract with the victim E to transfer all the facilities necessary for operation, such as the main entrance, cooling house, and table (facilities) to the part of G 2nd floor located in G cafeteria F in Gyeonggi-do.

Nevertheless, on May 4, 2016, the Defendant received the balance under the above contract from the injured party, and subsequently transferred the victim’s possession of the second floor of the above restaurant to the main entrance, etc., the Defendant: (a) transferred the ownership of the second floor of the restaurant to the victim; (b) but (c) committed theft with the market-free goods, such as misunderstandings, booms, and charcoal, owned by the victim from May 6, 2016 to May 6, 2016.

2. In the instant case where there is no evidence to specify the thief’s thief’s thief’s thief’s thief’s thief’s thief’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stalf’s stal.

On the other hand, it is recognized that the complainant is also included in food such as kimchi, including the above expendable goods, and there is a mutual dispute.

Therefore, in the case of charcoal, the complainant is in dispute as to whether it is subject to transfer as above.

arrow