Defendant

A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, and by imprisonment for five months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the owner of "E Gameland" in the Namsan-gu D and the third floor, and Defendant B is the exchanger that exchanges against customers in the above game site, and Defendant C is the employee of the above game site.

No one shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Defendant

A from June 7, 2015 to June 15:2, 2015, from June 22, 2015, from around 15:2, 2015 to June 22, 2015, the head of the said game room established and operated a 50-party game machine which was found in the game room and let many unspecified customers use the game water, and if the points obtained by the game are 20,000, he shall make it a separate charging card, and Defendant B made a deposit on the separate charging card, and Defendant B paid 10% of the fees by calculating the accumulated points per one won per unit upon request for exchange by the customers holding the accumulated card. Defendant C, knowing that such exchange was made, he, despite being aware of the fact, was in charge of the customer response, cleaning, etc. while working in the said game room.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to exchange or arrange for exchange intangible results obtained through the use of game water.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a criminal investigation report (Attachment of photo of enforcement scene);

1. Article 44 (1) 2, Article 32 (1) 7, and Article 30 of the Act on the Promotion of Game Industry and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor, concerning facts constituting a crime;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( normal circumstances in which the following sentencing is considered to be taken into account):

1. The community service order (defendant A and B) under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act and Article 44(2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the scope of recommendation)