1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

1. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of the descriptions of evidence No. 1, No. 2, No. 1, No. 2, and No. 3 of the basic facts, and the fact-finding results of the fact-finding inquiry as to the mass viewing of the party, as a whole.

The plaintiff is a corporation that carries on construction design and related service business, and the defendant is a corporation that carries on construction design and service business.

B. A construction deliberation is conducted by the Building Committee under the Building Act. A construction deliberation is conducted by the Landscape Committee under the Landscape Act, which was promulgated on August 6, 2013 and promulgated on February 7, 2014, which was newly implemented from February 7, 2014, or which should undergo a construction deliberation by the Landscape Committee under the Landscape Act. In cases of buildings determined to undergo a construction deliberation by the Landscape Committee under the Landscape Act, construction deliberation shall be conducted in accordance with the Building Act as a building-related relationship, and construction deliberation may include contents related to the landscape. In such cases, the part of the construction deliberation may partially overlap with the contents of the landscape deliberation.

C. On March 10, 2014, the Defendant entered into a service contract concerning "construction design (including building permission) part among the newly constructed multi-family housing construction works in Yangsan-gu Amsan-gu Amsan-gu Amsan-do Amsan-do Amsan-do Construction Co., Ltd.

On May 8, 2014, the Defendant concluded a service contract with the Plaintiff to provide the “construction deliberation service” related to the said new apartment construction for KRW 17 million (hereinafter “instant service contract”). At the time of entering into the instant service contract, the Defendant paid KRW 8.5 million out of the service price to the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 8 of the instant service contract at the time of entering into the instant service contract.

The defendant shall, at the request of the plaintiff, submit the defendant's data to the plaintiff on May 10, 2014 and May 13, 2014.