logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.06.07 2016나61529
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. The court's explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is the same as the part of paragraph (a) of Article 1 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

B. Determination 1) In full view of the following circumstances, where the above facts are recognized as bearing the evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings prior to the above recognition of liability, i.e., the location of the accident is the crosswalk, and it can be predicted that there can be people who cross the above crosswalk area even if the pedestrian signal is under the low-speed signal, even though it is installed at the center of the road up to the above crosswalk, it is possible to expect that there is a person who crosss the above crosswalk area without permission. E, even though it appears that the vehicle prior to the first lane prior to the accident of this case is continuous, it is concluded that the above preceding vehicle goes to turn to the left or to turn to the left at a limited speed of 60 km, and that the above preceding vehicle entered the above crosswalk at a speed of 7 km speed without permission, in light of the fact that the road traffic signal of this case, which is a driver of the vehicle of this case, is not proper, and that the vehicle of this case, which caused the accident of this case, damages to the driver of this case, the vehicle of this case.

arrow