logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.03.29 2015나4680
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. A change in the judgment of the first instance, including a claim extended and reduced in the trial as follows:

C. The plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff violated the Labor Standards Act by forcing the Plaintiff to resign without justifiable grounds, and assisted the Plaintiff to commit tort, such as injury to the Plaintiff, interference with duties, destruction and damage of equipment, homicide, intrusion upon residence (a building), attempted murder, invasion on privacy, violation of the Act on the Protection and Use, etc. of Location Information, Postal Service Act, insult, violation of the Postal Service Act, violation of freedom of residence, violation of freedom of movement of telephone Internet TV, attempted assault, attempted traffic accident, violation of the Food Sanitation Act.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff spent 6,300,000 won for oil and transportation expenses of 8,470,80 won for transportation expenses and 108,500 won for medical expenses and medicine expenses. As such, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff for compensation for damages the sum of KRW 6,30,000, transportation expenses of KRW 8,470,800, transportation expenses of KRW 8,500, medical expenses and medicine expenses of KRW 108,50,500, and KRW 14,620,700, and KRW 29,500,000. The Defendant is obligated to employ B and C, who are the Plaintiff’s children, as the Defendant’s employees of Grade 6 in office.

2. Each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 5, and 15 to 42, the defendant forced the plaintiff to resign without justifiable grounds and committed the plaintiff's alleged tort.

It is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff's children are liable to employ them as the defendant's employees, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge them.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion is without merit.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance, including the plaintiff's claim extended and reduced in the trial, shall be modified as above. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow