A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 8, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving license on the same day. On March 23:11, 2013, the Defendant driven a 300-meter B chip car from the road before the day of the frequency of the acquisition of the seawater entering the sea located in the feude-dong at the time of Jinju to the road before the feudio in the same way as it is under the influence of alcohol by 0.082%.

2. The Defendant forged a private document and was required to produce a driver’s license for a motor vehicle because the Defendant was discovered to the Jinju Police Station C District Assistant D due to drinking on the front of the finite, which is located in the finite-dong, at the time of a temporary border such as the above one.

Therefore, the defendant should be punished for drinking and non-licensed driving, so that he / she would drive his/her relative E, and notified the resident registration number of E to the police officer.

Therefore, the above police officer confirmed the possession of a driver's license based on the personal information of E through the police computer network, based on the Defendant's statement on the drinking driving, etc., and prepared a disturbance in form, such as a certificate of drinking alcohol driving, a report on detection of drinking drivers, a statement on the circumstances of drinking drivers, etc., and had the Defendant read the details stated in each document, and requested the Defendant to sign and seal them. The Defendant voluntarily signed the “E” in the name column of each document and affixed a seal on the right side of the name.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, forged each copy of the E certificate, one copy of the report on detection of a host driver, and one copy of the statement report on the circumstances of a host driver.

3. At the same time, the Defendant: (a) held a forged E name verification statement; (b) one copy of the report on detection of a host driver; and (c) one copy of the circumstantial statement report on a host driver; and (d) as if it was duly formed, to the police officer who was aware of the forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant;