logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2018.10.02 2018고정82
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 80,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. A defendant is engaged in driving a B K5 vehicle owned by himself/herself.

On November 18, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 02:10, and led the front door of the management office of the Myanmar apartment in front of the management office of the Myanmar apartment located in the Bupyeong-gu Eup located in the Bupyeong-do.

The location is the entrance of the apartment, where the passage of the ordinary vehicle is frequent.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering gear, etc. of the motor vehicle, report the traffic situation on the front side well to prevent accidents in advance, and when the driver or other crew of the motor vehicle is killed or injured or damaged by the traffic of the motor vehicle, the driver or other crew of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to immediately stop and take necessary measures.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to do so, and left the scene without taking any measure after he damages the fences equivalent to the cost of repairing the fences of KRW 400,000 to the front gate of the vehicle under consideration by shocking the fences installed adjacent to the Management Office of Myanmar apartment.

2. Although the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road not covered by mandatory insurance for violating the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act, the Defendant violated the said provision by running a motor vehicle B 5 km owned by himself/herself from the front road to the front road of the front road management office of the BK5 m from the front road to the front road of the front road management office of the BK5 m from around November 18, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Expenses incurred in repairing fences;

1. Inquiry into each mandatory insurance (B);

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual survey report;

1. Article 148 and Article 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 46(2)2 and 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act.

arrow