beta
Text
1. Defendant A’s imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B’s fine of KRW 2,00,000, Defendant C, D, and E are punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 2015, Defendant A leased three studio rooms in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, G, and H in Gwangju to employ female employees, and Defendant A thought that Defendant A would operate a sexual traffic business establishment called “I”.
Defendant
A, from January 1, 2016 to February 11, 2016, from the first patrolman, received 80,000 won from the nameless customers who find the place from the above “I” and provided guidance to the relevant studio, and had Defendant C, D, etc. employed by the female employee, in his/her hand, stimulated the customers to engage in a similar sexual intercourse.
As a result, Defendant A arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.
2. On January 2016, Defendant B, who was aware of the fact that Defendant B operated “I” as above and arranged sexual traffic in the French land below Gwangju Si, Defendant B, who received a pre-contract telephone from customers with commercial cell phones to assist Defendant A in doing the crime. In order to assist Defendant B, Defendant B, who received a pre-contract telephone from customers with commercial cell phones, was able to easily inform Defendant A of the crime.
3. Defendant C served as an employee of the said “I” from January 5, 2016 to February 11, 2016, and approximately 50 persons of sexual intercourse similar to those of customers in the name of 50 persons, and received KRW 80,000 each time in return.
Accordingly, Defendant C was engaged in sexual traffic.
4. Defendant D worked as female employees from January 31, 2016 to February 11, 2016, Defendant D provided approximately 20 sexual intercourses similar to those of customers, and received KRW 80,000 each time in return.
Accordingly, Defendant D was engaged in sexual traffic.
5. Defendant E’s indictment is written as “J” but appears to be a clerical error.
Defendant
E around 14:00 on February 11, 2016, around 14:00, around “I” engaged in the conduct of similarity with Defendant C once with Defendant C and paid KRW 80,000 in return.
Accordingly, Defendant E was engaged in sexual traffic.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the Defendants and K.