The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court’s judgment’s summary of the grounds for appeal (the first-A, second-month imprisonment with prison labor and one-year and four months imprisonment with prison labor with prison labor for the remaining crimes) is too unreasonable.

2. We can take into account the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the instant crimes; (b) the Defendant agreed with F, I, K,O, H, AG, and K among the victims; and (c) the Defendant’s wife and his father and wife are supported by the Defendant.

However, most of the crimes of this case are crimes committed during the period of repeated crime due to the same type of punishment. In particular, among the crimes of this case committed by the defendant, each of the offenses of this case is very planned and closely sealed, and has not yet reached an agreement with the victim Z and AE, and all of the sentencing conditions in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, criminal records, circumstances after the crime, risk of recidivism, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.