1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of this court's judgment concerning this case is as follows. This court's judgment concerning this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is the same as that of the court of first instance except to dismiss or add part of the court of first instance as mentioned below 2.

(The grounds for appeal by the original defendant are not significantly different from the allegations in the first instance court, and even if the evidence submitted in the first instance court's examination was presented, it is deemed reasonable to find facts in the first instance court and make a determination on the facts of the evidence). 2. 4. (1) The portion added or revised on February 2, 2017, "18,815,600 won" was "18,615,600 won for materials for February 2017."

(2) 4th 13th 13th h (f) of the first instance judgment (h 5th h) (h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h) added “(h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

(3) The following is added to the 6th 17th 17th 1st son of the first instance judgment (20th 5th 6th 5th below).

On January 25, 2019, the above court rendered a judgment to the non-party company that "after the conclusion of the contract in this case, the original defendant and the non-party company agreed to amend the terms that the rental fee for material costs for the temporary materials in this case shall be paid to the plaintiff and the personnel expenses for the establishment, management, and dismantling of the temporary materials in this case shall be paid to the non-party company. Accordingly, the defendant issued a judgment to the non-party company that "the sum of the labor expenses for the portion of July 25, 2018 and August, 201,

The defendant appealed and continues to appeal (this Court 2019Na55781).

(4) From the 9th end of the judgment of the first instance court to the 10th 3th 10th 20th 10 "it is difficult to see that there is a recognized practice" as follows.

'The plaintiff installed a 1.2m height of 1.2m above in order to cover the slab above the top floor of the building of this case on the slab (Slab).