logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.10.06 2013가단48101
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 54,639,956 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 15, 2013 to October 6, 2015 for the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) On May 31, 2012, the Plaintiff, a civilian military employee, was under the daily life of the Plaintiff at a hospital B operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).

(2) On December 15, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) on the water of December 15, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to restrictions on the traffic of the right ske lines and the air-conditioning movement; and (b) on February 15, 2013, the Defendant hospital received the instant surgery from the right knee kne-feling care (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

(3) On February 22, 2013, the Plaintiff: (a) increased the pain of the operation department; and (b) increased the heat of the 38.2 degrees on February 23, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant hospital diagnosed it as an scarcity salt through the cRP analysis and the cRP test, etc., and implemented active anti-pacting, washing, etc.

On March 4, 2013, 2013, it was found that the plaintiff's knee is infected with MESA (Maphycocus).

B. (1) Reusable devices used for ornamental water alcohol, such as the details of measures to prevent infection in the medical record, must be all ruptureed after thorough washing (using high temperature team, high temperature thermal power team, standard temperature gravity team, 100% ethylene, etc.).

(2) The Defendant hospital stated “Routine A/Sing” in the records of an operation, which means that the Defendant hospital carried out routing using routine and routine surgery before the operation, or routing using routing surgery.

There is no additional statement on the destruction of germs or washing of operating organizations in the medical record.

(3) In addition, C, a medical doctor who performed the instant operation, did not enter the disinfection method and the disinfection method at the time, stating, “I did not know of the method of disinfection for the surgery,” on the ground that “I did not know of the method of disinfection for the surgery.”

C. Following the instant surgery, the Plaintiff’s condition, etc. (1) caused chemical infinite infections after the instant surgery, resulting in the Plaintiff’s restriction on the instant surgery at the operating department’s infinite exercise (part-time and 65 degrees).

(ii).

arrow