1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The court's explanation on this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Assertion and determination

A. The defendant's liability for damages in lieu of defect repair (1) The plaintiff asserts that the plaintiff is liable to pay the plaintiff 69,283,000 won and damages for delay on the ground that there are defects arising from the non-construction or the modified construction of the building of this case, and the construction cost necessary for repairing the defects is KRW 69,283,00,000.

(1) The Plaintiff’s claim and application form for change of the cause of the claim are limited to a claim for damages in lieu of defect repair. Thus, the claim in the trial is deemed to have been withdrawn from the warranty bond. The Plaintiff’s claim is deemed to be a defect repair bond. The separate construction cost of each household toilet shall be installed in the 1,819,87 Won 2, which is not installed in accordance with the standard size, and the construction cost of each household toilet toilet 2, which is re- installed in accordance with the re-standard. The construction cost of each household toilet 3,068 Won 9,068 KRW 95,261,84, 844, the construction cost of each household wall 55,261,84, and each household floor 160,166,527, and the construction cost of each household toilet 1,819,296,305,296, and 360,000,000 won or more of the defect repair work cost of each of this case.

(2) The defendant alleged that the plaintiff ordered the removal of the wall from the wall to the end of the removal of the wall, but there is no evidence to support this. (2) The defendant's repair work cost of the No. 3 defect repair work in the above table.