1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Each building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) is constructed on the ground D and E at the Southern-si.

B. On the ground such as F, G, H, D, E, etc., 16 buildings were built, including the instant building. However, on the building ledger, 12 buildings, including the instant building, among the said 16 buildings were included in the building ledger as a building constructed on the F-ground at the south-ju city.

(A) According to the evidence No. 7, 8, and No. 1 of the above 12 building register, the above 12 buildings were not constructed as a separate building, and the building No. 7, 8, and No. 1 of the above 12 buildings were not recorded in the building register and the building register No. 35.96m2 (the building No. 4 of the attached Table). However, although the building No. 30.96m2 (the building No. 30. 96m2), according to the witness N's testimony and arguments, the building No. 4 of the attached Table No. 4 was recorded in the building register and the building No. 30. 96m2 separately from the building No. 4 of the attached Table No. 1 of the above real estate register and the copy of the building register No. 30. 96m2 (the building No. 96m2) are recorded in the building register and the building register No. 30. 46m2.

B. At the time of August 9, 1995, I, Sungsan, Co., Ltd., Ltd., and J, agreed to change the lot number on the building ledger into F, G, H, D, and E in Namyang-si, Nam-si, the actual status of which is the actual status (in the case of the building in this case, the agreement was made to change to D and E) and subsequently, on October 13, 1999, the lot number of the building register of the building in the above 12 building that was recorded on the previous building ledger was corrected to F, G, K, H, and L due to the omission of D and E lot number in the correction process.