beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 23, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Seoul Southern District Court on October 23, 2014, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 10, 2015.
Defendant
A around March 201, as a person who runs a construction business, entered into a contract for the new construction of G church located in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City of Gyeonggi-do with H KRW 5,30,000,000,000, and around that time, it was false to the purport that “The employees I, at the time, engaged in ordinary engineering (G church construction) in the area of the Hanam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, would pay 176,000,000 won (the price shall be reduced to KRW 140,000,000,000,000,000,000 won (the price shall be reduced to KRW 1,40,00,000,000,00
However, at that time, the Defendant was unable to pay wages, material costs, etc. due to financial difficulties while running the J church Corporation (the construction cost of KRW 5-600 million), K Officetel Corporation (the construction cost of KRW 1.7 billion), and Seoul LL Corporation (the construction cost of KRW 8.9 billion). In the situation where there was no property owned by the Defendant, such as deposits, real estate, etc., the Defendant was liable for the Defendant’s liability of KRW 4.3 million for M, financial institutions, KRW 20 million, and KRW 100 million, and even if the victim completed the steel structure within the payment period, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the payment to the victim on the agreed date.
Nevertheless, the defendant deceiving I as above and let the victim complete the steel structure and install it, but did not pay 1.2 million won out of the above 1.4 million won, and acquired it by deception.
The Defendants, “2017 Highest 489”, while running a construction company, failed to meet the funds, so that the victims N who are engaged in the strawing industry in the case of Defendant A’s elementary school in the case of the 2017 Highest 489, may exclusively supply the cremation to the head of the O funeral hall.