Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as an employee in a general restaurant in the name of Jung-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu, and D.

No one shall sell, lend, or provide free of charge any alcoholic beverage that is a drug harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, around 05:00 on December 25, 2016, the Defendant sold to juvenile E, etc., juvenile E, etc., a juvenile, who had been a guest at the above restaurant, 52,00 won a week of harmful drugs.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F and G;

1. A H statement;

1. On-site photographs, a business report certificate, each resident registration card, etc. (the defendant and his/her defense counsel confirmed the identification card of juvenile E, etc. which the defendant first entered into a smartphone by using his/her photograph stored in his/her smartphone, and thus, the juvenile F, etc. which was later known to be not a juvenile and later combined with the juvenile F, etc., did not intend to commit a violation of the Juvenile Protection Act because they did not take a separate order. However, this court held that there was no intention to commit a violation of the Juvenile Protection Act. However, the following circumstances acknowledged and duly adopted and investigated by the court pursuant to the aforementioned evidence, i.e., where a person with a legitimate identification card enters a smartphone by storing and carrying his/her identification card in a smartphone for tobacco purchase, etc., this case’s case where he/she had a duty to verify the age of the other party’s age" under Article 28(3) of the Juvenile Protection Act solely on the characteristics of smartphones that can be

In light of the fact that the Defendant could not be seen as having been aware of the fact that the rest of the customers were able to be able to take part in drinking, and that he did not demand the confirmation of identification card, and that there was an intentional act on the juvenile and the sales of Mana Juvenile.

It is reasonable to view it.

Therefore, all of the above arguments are accepted.