logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원정읍지원 2019.02.13 2018가합2733
징계처분무효확인의소
Text

1. On May 30, 2017, the Defendant confirmed that a one-month disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff, which was taken against the Plaintiff, is invalid.

2...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 30, 200, the Plaintiff became an employee of the Defendant and served as the head of the Defendant’s branch office from June 30, 2015 to April 4, 2017. On May 30, 2017, the Plaintiff was subject to a disciplinary action for one month from the Defendant’s suspension from office (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).

B. On March 28, 2017, the Defendant received a written application from the Defendant stating that the Plaintiff was in bad faith, and on April 3, 2017, the Defendant issued a personnel order ordering the Plaintiff to perform general duties and duties as of April 5, 2017. (2) On April 7, 2017, the Plaintiff submitted an explanatory note to the Defendant on April 7, 2017, but thereafter, the Plaintiff continued to file a civil petition with the same content as the written application in the preceding paragraph.

3) On May 23, 2017, the head of the planning and inspection office D, to which the Defendant belongs, conducted an investigation by means of preparing a written response with the Plaintiff on May 23, 2017. 4) On May 26, 2017, the Defendant decided to hold a personnel committee (age damage to an association) as of May 30, 2017 in order to handle the Plaintiff’s civil petition. On May 26, 2017, the Defendant notified the members of the personnel committee of the agenda and the contents of the notification on the request for resolution and notice for notification, and the granting of an opportunity for explanation, but did not notify the Plaintiff in writing.

5) On May 30, 2017, the second personnel committee of the Defendant in 2017 held a meeting room of the second personnel committee of the Defendant Union 13:30 on May 30, 2017, and the instant disciplinary action against the Plaintiff was issued for one month of suspension from office without the Plaintiff’s attendance. (C) The summary of the personnel regulations is the Defendant’s personnel regulations related to the instant disciplinary action (hereinafter “the instant personnel regulations”).

Article 72 (Convocation of Personnel Committee and Time of Resolution) (1) The Chairperson of the Personnel Affairs Committee shall convene the Personnel Affairs Committee in the event of any illegality of an employee or any request for disciplinary action against an employee from the head of the Cooperative Audit Committee. Article 73 (Disciplinary Action and Disciplinary Action)

arrow