beta
Text
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.
In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 15, 2013, around 16:00, Defendant A attended the Busan District Court No. 355, which was located in Busan District Court, as a witness of a violation of national technical qualification law against Defendant F, et al., 2013, Defendant F, et al., and 15, who was notified of the right to refuse to testify.
Around May 15, 2009, the above case was that F borrowed a national technical qualification certificate from 22 persons including the Defendant at the office of the cadastral surveying technician in Jungbu Co., Ltd., and the Defendant lent a national technical qualification certificate to F. The Defendant only lent a national technical qualification certificate to F. The Defendant did not work as an employee in the above company from May 15, 2009, nor did he worked in the above company office at the above company office from May 15, 2009, and there was only two to three times at the scene of Japan.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, “A witness, even after May 2009, was present at the Central Cadastral Survey Team of the Company, and was working for the Defendant.”
“I have not worked every day” in the newspaper “I have worked four to five times each month.”
“At the site,” and “At the site, the witness appeared at the site several times.”
“I memory not less than 10 times” in the newspaper “.”
“At the time of the presiding judge’s testimony,” and “At the time of the presiding judge’s attendance at the office of the Central Cadastral Survey Technology Co., Ltd. on several occasions.
In the newspaper "," "I have worked more than three to four times a month, and there was a call."
“The testimony was made.”
Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to memory and raised perjury.
2. On July 15, 2013, the Defendant appeared in Busan District Court No. 355, Jul. 16, 2013, Defendant B, at the court of Busan District Court No. 355, Defendant F, etc., and was notified of the right to refuse to testify.
The above case is from 22 technicians, including the defendant, etc., at the office of the cadastral survey technology division among the corporation around January 1, 2009.