logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
서울고등법원 2019.07.10 2018나2058593
매매대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning of this court’s judgment citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the corresponding part among the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

Under the 6th page, “Each entry” was accepted by the Defendant as the purchaser of the instant sales contract due to the lack of a large amount of loans secured by the instant land in the event that the Plaintiff becomes a purchaser of the instant sales contract and as the purchaser of the instant building due to the lack of a large amount of loans secured by E and G, but the Defendant accepted the Plaintiff as the subject of the rights and obligations pursuant to the instant sales contract (the economic effect pursuant to the instant sales contract seems to be a matter to be resolved separately from E and G) as “each entry” (except for the portion not believed in the next below) and “each entry” under the 7th page 4 correction to “each entry” under the 7th sentence correction to “part of witness E and witness at each trial”, and it is difficult to view that the testimony or testimony was made in accordance with the 7th sentence correction to the effect of “the objective testimony,” and it is still difficult to view that the testimony or testimony was made as the subject of the instant sales contract.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow