logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.02.15 2016고정1319
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 10, 2016, at the D convenience store located in Kimpo-si C around 16:40 on August 10, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim by pushing the victim's body while the Defendant was boomed with the victim for having a vehicle door of the victim E (the age of 61).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some statements made in the police interrogation protocol concerning E;

1. Application of investigation reports (verification of CCTVs), CCTV photographs, and CCTV video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 260 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting a crime and Article 260 of the Criminal Act chosen to punish a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the point of injury to the victim) of the Provisional Payment Order;

1. On August 10, 2016, the Defendant, at the D convenience store located in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, on the ground that the Defendant laid the door of the vehicle of the victim E (the age of 61) at the victim’s convenience store and took a bath, the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim, such as dynasiums and tensions that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The main point of the argument is that the Defendant used a little spoke of the victim’s body by pushing the victim’s body during the vision with the victim, but there is no fact that the Defendant had the victim go beyond the upper floor by cutting down the victim.

The victim's beyond is that the victim's body was lost balance because the victim's body was tightly by the defendant, and the victim's force was lost.

B. E’s evidence that conforms to this part of the facts charged is that the Defendant was written on the floor and laid down on the floor.

"," and "the defendant was in his hand flabed with flabbage, flabing the rear side and flabing the lower bottom in the future, and exceeded the floor like the defendant.

"," and "the defendant laid down beyond the sub-speaks."

Any statement made to an investigative agency with the content of " shall be recorded as well as any statement made in the protocol of examination of witnesses other than the public trial."

However, this shall not apply.

arrow