본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
서울동부지방법원 2018.06.15 2018고단422

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.


Punishment of the crime

On December 26, 2017, around 01:30 on the road in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 stating that there was a person who would set up the door door of D, and who was dispatched after receiving a report from 112, the Defendant solicited the police officer F of the Seoul Mine Police Station E box affiliated with the Seoul Gwangjin Police Station Epis to stop the Defendant’s desire and return to the Republic of Korea; (b) “The Defendant was the internal age of 60; (c) was spawn at the king, and was spawned once.

“I am sound,” and assault F to F the face of F, who is f.m.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written statements of D;

1. 112 Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing the table of reported case settlement;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, although the nature of the crime of this case is not weak, the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects it, the defendant deposited KRW 1 million to recover damage to the victimized police officer, the defendant did not have any record of punishment for violence or the same kind of crime, the defendant's wife and family members want to take the defendant's preference, and the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc. shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account various factors of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, including the circumstances after the crime.