logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.09.03 2013고정2294
절도
Text

The defendant shall announce the reasons for the judgment of innocence.

Reasons

1. On July 13, 2013, at around 09:35, the Defendant discovered a driver’s license with the victim E in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, one credit card of Gwangju Bank, one national bank credit card, one credit card of foreign exchange bank, one modern credit card, one national bank security card, and one national bank security card, and then cut off the Defendant’s Franc and put it into the top of the car.

2. The defendant's assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel brought about harm to the victim by finding the victim's wall, and thus there is no intention of larceny and no intention of unlawful acquisition.

3. In light of the following facts, it is insufficient to recognize the facts charged in the instant case that the Defendant thought that he would steal the victim only with the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

According to the police interrogation protocol against the defendant, on July 15, 2013, the defendant confirmed the wall from the vehicle at the time of the police investigation (after the case), and reported the name of E in the wall, and the office phone and the handphone phone phone phone. The office was informed of the telephone, and the handphone was replaced by the number. The other name phone phone was called. The witness E’s testimony changed, according to the witness E’s witness E’s legal statement, the cell phone number and the head office phone number stated in the actual E’s name were changed before the month of the occurrence of the case.

B. According to the witness E and G’s legal statement, the notice of the submission of the prosecutor’s communication data (Evidence Nos. 7-1), and the written evidence Nos. 1 through 3 of the submission of a defense counsel, the Defendant deemed that he was on July 13, 2013, on which he/she acquired the wall’s name, and phoneed to H who is a public official, as the R&D general manager for which E proceeds, and the Defendant also reported that he/she was on the name of I in the wall.

arrow